Discover the genesis of peer review and scroll to the bottom to share your thoughts about its future.
Issue #1: A Brief History of Peer Review
When you choose to publish with 游加电竞 , your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open.
The 游加电竞 Peer Review Toolbox is your source for peer review best practice and practical tips to build your scientific skillset. Build up your personal store of peer review know-how with the archives below and sign up to get fresh resources and advice delivered to your inbox every two weeks.
Discover the genesis of peer review and scroll to the bottom to share your thoughts about its future.
A look at the types of peer review you might be asked to participate in.
游加电竞 editors offer their advice for becoming a great peer reviewer.
Things to watch out for, and the three key questions to ask as you read.
A quick guide to writing the reviews you’d like to receive.
Check out what your peers think and read the latest research into peer review.
Easy things you can do right now to help editors find you.
Strategies that require a bit more time and attention, but can benefit your career for years to come.
Lean what does an effective data review look like, and what to watch out for as you assess a dataset.
When should you accept or decline an invitation to peer review?
How close does a relationship have to be before it qualifies as a competing interest?
Giving feedback can be hard—strategies for balancing clear and actionable criticism with a constructive tone.
游加电竞 announces a modular, opt-in approach to transparent peer review.
New ways for reviewers to claim credit with ORCID.
What is the difference between Open Access and Open Science—and why does it matter?
How can you get involved in Open Science as an author?
Getting active in Open Science as a reader, reviewer, student, or junior researcher.
How is rereview different from first-round review?
Most of the time, different reviewers start their assessment at about the same time. But there are exceptions.
If you comment on a preprint, will anyone actually read your feedback? How do authors feel about preprint comments?
Is it okay to contact editors without an invitation?
Giving meaningful and constructive peer review feedback